Please wait

British troops risk their lives to protect the UK and our way of life

but what about the people who should be watching their backs?

Unfortunately, it seems very few are actually doing their jobs...

Full details of the BBC complaint from Adrian Mallett

After watching the BBC Conspiracy Files program called '9/11 Ten Years On' Adrian Mallett, a member of the 9/11 truth movement, decided to complain to the BBC. The program distorted or avoided the facts in order to cast members of the 9/11 Truth Movement in the worst possible light.

The BBC then broadcast a further program called '9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip' which can only be described as blatant propaganda in support of the official story. It was full of truly ridiculous 'demonstrated' and 'experimental' evidence heavily stacked to make a group of carefully selected young people, not fooled by the official story, look callous and delusional. The program was so bad that even people who had no idea of any of the problems with the official story thought it was daft.

The BBC is governed by it own charter in which it states it is dedicated to the principles of accuracy and impartiality. Both programs mentioned above, and especially the Road Trip propaganda, ignored the BBC charter. If you care to read through the complaint correspondence that follows you will see that the BBC charter is nothing more than a paper exercise and the BBC itself has no interest in ensuring its producers comply with the rules.

Index of complaint correspondence

Date

Title

09/08/2011

Initial complaint sent by email to the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

25/08/2011

Reply by email from Gareth Brennan of the BBC Audience Services

25/08/2011

Further email to Gareth Brennan of the BBC Audience Services

12/09/2011

Email to Gareth Brennan of BBC Complaints

19/09/2011

Letter from Tanya McKee of BBC Complaints (PDF)

01/10/2011

Email to Tanya McKee of BBC Complaints

07/11/2011

Letter from Gemma McCartan of BBC Complaints (PDF)

02/12/2011

Letter to Gemma McCartan of BBC Complaints

13/12/2011

Email from Patrick Clyde of BBC Complaints

14/12/2011

Email to Patrick Clyde of BBC Complaints

15/01/2012

Further letter to Gemma McCartan of BBC Complaints

11/02/2012

Email from Stuart Webb of BBC Complaints

12/02/2012

Email from Jamie Patterson of BBC Complaints

16/02/2012

Letter to the BBC Editorial Complaints Unit

17/02/2012

No further comments reply from the BBC (PDF)

24/02/2012

Letter from Colin Tregear of the BBC ECU (PDF)

03/04/2012

1200092 911 Conspiracy Road Trip ECU Finding (PDF)

05/04/2012

1200091 The Conspiracy Files 911 Ten Years On ECU Finding (PDF)

23/04/2012

Letter to Lucy Tristam of the BBC Trust Unit

25/04/2012

Email reply from John Hamer of the BBC Trust Unit

29/05/2012

Email from Lucy Tristam of the BBC Trust Unit

30/05/2012

Email to Lucy Tristam of the BBC Trust Unit

13/06/2012

Reply from BBC - Conspiracy Files Mallett (PDF)

13/06/2012

Reply from BBC - Conspiracy Files Annex 2 (PDF)

13/06/2012

Reply from BBC - Conspiracy Road Trip Mallett (PDF)

13/06/2012

Reply from BBC - Conspiracy Road Trip Annex 2 (PDF)

24/06/2012

Letter to Lucy Tristam of the BBC Trust Unit


13/12/2011 - Email from Patrick Clyde of BBC Complaints

Dear Mr Mallett

Reference CAS-955156-6T8K92

Thank you for your further contact regarding ‘9/11 - The Truth behind the Third Tower’, broadcast on 30 June 2011 on BBC Four.

Firstly, please accept our apologies for the delay in replying. We know our correspondents appreciate a quick response and we are sorry you have had to wait on this occasion.

We have forwarded your concerns on this issue to the production team responsible for the programme and they explained in response that:

“The documentary could not consider all the theories and all the arguments surrounding this subject in the 59 minutes available. The producers selected and analysed the main theories that have the greatest currency.

They then provided as much information as possible on each theory to enable viewers to understand the arguments involved.

The documentary interviewed a selection of leading exponents of conspiracy theories about 9/11 and could not interview every expert or commentator. The programme makers believe that the film was a fair reflection of the arguments propounded on both sides of the debate and was made entirely within the BBC's editorial guidelines.”

That said, please be assured your further concerns will be added to our audience log, a daily report of audience feedback that's made available to many BBC staff, including members of the BBC Executive Board, channel controllers and other senior managers.

The audience logs are seen as important documents that can help shape decisions about future programming and content.

Thanks again for taking the time to contact us.

Kind Regards
Patrick Clyde
BBC Complaints


« Previous item

^ Return to index ^

Next item »