Please wait
Home » BBC » Adrian Mallett's full complaint Full details of the BBC complaint from Adrian MallettAfter watching the BBC Conspiracy Files program called '9/11 Ten Years On' Adrian Mallett, a member of the 9/11 truth movement, decided to complain to the BBC. The program distorted or avoided the facts in order to cast members of the 9/11 Truth Movement in the worst possible light. The BBC then broadcast a further program called '9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip' which can only be described as blatant propaganda in support of the official story. It was full of truly ridiculous 'demonstrated' and 'experimental' evidence heavily stacked to make a group of carefully selected young people, not fooled by the official story, look callous and delusional. The program was so bad that even people who had no idea of any of the problems with the official story thought it was daft. The BBC is governed by it own charter in which it states it is dedicated to the principles of accuracy and impartiality. Both programs mentioned above, and especially the Road Trip propaganda, ignored the BBC charter. If you care to read through the complaint correspondence that follows you will see that the BBC charter is nothing more than a paper exercise and the BBC itself has no interest in ensuring its producers comply with the rules. Index of complaint correspondence
13/12/2011 - Email from Patrick Clyde of BBC ComplaintsDear Mr Mallett Reference CAS-955156-6T8K92 Thank you for your further contact regarding ‘9/11 - The Truth behind the Third Tower’, broadcast on 30 June 2011 on BBC Four. Firstly, please accept our apologies for the delay in replying. We know our correspondents appreciate a quick response and we are sorry you have had to wait on this occasion. We have forwarded your concerns on this issue to the production team responsible for the programme and they explained in response that: “The documentary could not consider all the theories and all the arguments surrounding this subject in the 59 minutes available. The producers selected and analysed the main theories that have the greatest currency. They then provided as much information as possible on each theory to enable viewers to understand the arguments involved. The documentary interviewed a selection of leading exponents of conspiracy theories about 9/11 and could not interview every expert or commentator. The programme makers believe that the film was a fair reflection of the arguments propounded on both sides of the debate and was made entirely within the BBC's editorial guidelines.” That said, please be assured your further concerns will be added to our audience log, a daily report of audience feedback that's made available to many BBC staff, including members of the BBC Executive Board, channel controllers and other senior managers. The audience logs are seen as important documents that can help shape decisions about future programming and content. Thanks again for taking the time to contact us.
Kind Regards
|