Please wait
Home » BBC » Adrian Mallett's full complaint Full details of the BBC complaint from Adrian MallettAfter watching the BBC Conspiracy Files program called '9/11 Ten Years On' Adrian Mallett, a member of the 9/11 truth movement, decided to complain to the BBC. The program distorted or avoided the facts in order to cast members of the 9/11 Truth Movement in the worst possible light. The BBC then broadcast a further program called '9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip' which can only be described as blatant propaganda in support of the official story. It was full of truly ridiculous 'demonstrated' and 'experimental' evidence heavily stacked to make a group of carefully selected young people, not fooled by the official story, look callous and delusional. The program was so bad that even people who had no idea of any of the problems with the official story thought it was daft. The BBC is governed by it own charter in which it states it is dedicated to the principles of accuracy and impartiality. Both programs mentioned above, and especially the Road Trip propaganda, ignored the BBC charter. If you care to read through the complaint correspondence that follows you will see that the BBC charter is nothing more than a paper exercise and the BBC itself has no interest in ensuring its producers comply with the rules. Index of complaint correspondence
25/04/2012 - Email reply from John Hamer of the BBC Trust UnitDear Mr Mallett I am writing to acknowledge receipt of your appeal dated 24 April 2012. We will now consider your request for an appeal under the BBC’s editorial complaints procedure. In order to do this we will review your complaint and your previous correspondence with the BBC. We will do this as quickly as possible and will let you know as soon as we reach a decision. We will also keep you informed if for any reason we meet with delay during this process. Full details of the complaints procedure, including the appeal stage, can be found here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/regulatory_framework/protocols/2011/e3_editorial_complaints.pdf. Yours sincerely
John Hamer
|